[Editorial Note]: Welcome Amy André, writer and sexual educator, for her first post on JVoices.com
I couldn’t be more proud or more thrilled to share my news with you! Last year, the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) commissioned me to co-author a publication on bisexual health for their acclaimed Policy Institute. This document, titled Bisexual Health: An Introduction and Model Practices for HIV/ STI Prevention Programming, represents the first time a national LGBT nonprofit organization has devoted resources like this to the topic of bisexual health, and I was extremely honored to be a part of it.
I spent over a year working on it, and on March 13, the 143-page report was officially released! The past week has been an absolute whirlwind, as I participated in a national press conference on the release date, and, just early this morning, was interviewed live on the radio at KPFK in Los Angeles.
Bisexual Health is downloadable as a *free* PDF on the Task Force websitehere, and is described on the Task Force website and in this press release.
I urge you to check out the report, which contains information about the state of bisexual health (in a word: heart-breaking) and what we can do about it (aka, the good news!). In a nutshell, there is very little research on bisexual health, but what’s out there indicates that bisexuals are experiencing the following *in higher rates than lesbians, gays, and heterosexuals*:
– depression and other mental illness
– alcohol and drug abuse (For example, bi women are 3X more likely than heterosexual women and twice more likely than lesbians to be heavy drinkers.)
– smoking (For example, bi women smoke slightly, but significantly, more than lesbians and 2 to 3 times more than heterosexuals. Major cancer risk.)
– intimate partner violence and physical assault (For example, significantly higher numbers of bisexual women experience being punched or beaten, compared to lesbians and heterosexual women.)
– stigma and phobia (For example, in studies comparing attitudes toward groups such as Protestants, pro-lifers, people with HIV, African Americans, etc., bisexuals are rated second only to IV drug users in level of stigma.)
Most research that even mentions bisexuals lumps us together with gays and lesbians, which skews our understanding of lesbian/ gay health, too; only when identities are teased apart, do we see these significant differences. The bottom line is, no matter what someone’s orientation identity, none of this okay. Something needs to be done.
That’s where you come in. I just finished the publication, but the real work starts now. There is a lot that health care providers, medical researchers, and the bi and LGBT communities can do to address these issues, and the report outlines some critical – and easy to implement – low-cost and no-cost steps!
So if you’re bi or know someone who is (and since you know me, the answer is “yes�), please help spread the word. Tell your doctor, your local health department, your LGBT community, and everyone else you know to download the report (it’s free!) and take action. Press coverage is especially important. If you have media contacts, tell them too. I’ll be doing the same, and together, we can improve the health and lives of bisexuals.
Be healthy,
Amy
The Coffee Calendar 2009 by Ricardo Levins Morales Onsale Now:
blog advertising is good for you

Bill Samuels
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:07 am
I was not impressed with your report, which tapped more into political correctness and political agendas than into honest reality about bisexuals. I seriously question the “studies” that you refer to and find your alleged “research” more self-serving (for Bi Activists) than anything else. The vast majority of people who label themselves “bisexual” are predominently gay and need to accept themselves as such. Nearly forty years after the Stonewall rebellion and people are still in denial! Want to read more of an alternative opinion? Go to:
http://jatgab.blogspot.com
Scan down to the essay entitled “The Gay/Bisexual Debate.” (A perspective on this issue from a Jewish Gay Male Activist.)
Marisa
March 23rd, 2007 at 8:38 am
Oh, for goodness sakes… do you also think that people with one blue eye and one green eye are actually in denial about being green-eyed? I’m glad to see that more research is being done to benefit people whose lives don’t easily fit into either/or, especially when they can frequently be at greatest risk.
And as for those high levels of depression… I think Bill’s comment has provided ample evidence for why those levels are so high. It’s one thing to be hated for your sexuality (and yes, I know all about that…) but it’s another to experience that same hatred at the same time as having your entire experience of life snootily dismissed.
Bill Samuels
March 27th, 2007 at 4:45 am
It’s not about being hated by others, but by hating yourself. It’s not about being “snooty,” but being honest, even at the risk of being politically incorrect and excoriated for it. There may be — undoubtedly are –some genuine bisexuals in the world, but this sloppily-researched, oh-so-politically correct, twist-the-facts-to-fit-your-bias report will convince only the gullible that ALL bisexuals are genuinely “bisexual” and don’t have an obvious preference. Surely SOME “bi’s” are gay people who are depressed for the simple reason that they can’t fully accept themselves and come out — but if you dare to say this you’re labeled a “bigot.” If you want to just believe and accept everything in this report without examining the issues — and the report itself — more carefully, then your argument has about as much substance and relevance as your truly pointless green eye/blue eye
comparison. If THAT is the level of discussion on this issue, no wonder the Report is such a mess.
Marisa
March 27th, 2007 at 10:34 am
I’m not saying I believe eveything I read without questioning, but I think that one should approach academic research with a spirit of true inquiry. It’s one thing to review the research and ask important questions about data collection, but it’s another thing entirely to make unsubstantiated judgements about the community in question and disparage their experience.
I agree with you that “true” bisexuals are most likely a rarity; by that I mean people who are equally attracted to people of all genders. I think Kinsey’s research showed that most people fall somewhere between “completely” straight and “completely” gay… so what term would you use for a man who is attracted to women 60% of the time and men 40% of the time? Since his attraction to men & women isn’t equal, is he in denial? And if so, about what?
The people I’ve met who have chosen to identify as bisexual fall all over this spectrum, but all of them have dated both men and women at some point in their lives, all of them feel that the word bisexual is the best available term they have at the moment, and all of them have experienced some kind of stigma as a result.
Bill Samuels
April 10th, 2007 at 3:48 am
I hear what you’re saying, but the bisexuals you’re talking about — if they feel discriminated against by both gays and straights — can choose to date/have relationships with other bisexual men and women, whom they can easily meet at bi social groups in every major city or over the Internet. They can choose from both men and women which, if anything, should increase their opportunities to find a partner. Then maybe — forgive me — this whining about biphobia will stop! No one on Earth is attracted “to women 60% of the time and men 40% of the time;” I assume what you meant to say is that your theoretical man is 60% gay and 40% straight, but in this case the difference is so small that such a person could probably be called bisexual, leaning towards gay. Many bi’s have problems being completely honest with themselves because there is a stigma attached to same-sex relationships that is not attached to opposite sex relationships [think bi's experience stigma? try being out and proud as a totally gay person and see what "experiencing stigma" is all about. It is NOT the same. Bi's don't understand this because they have no out, proud gay identity.] They wonder — “am I gay? am I straight?” the same way Gays do before they come out. My problem is that Bi Rights wants us to believe that a man who is 80% gay and 20% straight — who greatly prefers his own sex — is somehow “bisexual.” Perhaps in the technical sense, but most men in that category — myself included — identify as gay. We should all try to be open-minded but let’s not ignore certain realities. My best to you.
Marisa
April 10th, 2007 at 9:02 am
Thatnks for your more considered response Bill, but I still disagree. I tend to call myself queer, because although I mostly date women, once in a blue moon there will be a boy I like. Hence, “bisexual” doesn’t feel right to me personally, and neither does “lesbian.” But I’ll tell you - when I’m dating a boy, there’s all kinds of covert questioning from the gay community about whether or not I’m “really” gay. All of a sudden, the gay community ceases to feel like the safe community I had hoped it would be for me. And people who have near-equal numbers of boyfriends and girlfriends wind up being treated by both the straight and gay communities as inauthentic on a regular basis. Now, I always assumed that the goal for all of us was coexistence - but it sounds like you’re saying that bisexuals should be corralled with each other for their own safety, or something… which I believe was the same justification used for the creation of the Vilna Ghetto. Experiencing stigma from the general population is an experience I share with bisexuals; experiencing stigma from my own community is something I hope one day none of us has to feel.
daniel
April 11th, 2007 at 1:16 pm
well, i’ve never felt particularly drawn to “bisexual” as a label, but i wanted to point out two specific contexts in which folks who don’t restrict their sexual activity on the basis of gender (generally not identifying as ‘bisexual’) get specifically attacked in ways that aren’t reducible to ‘regular’ anti-queer crap.
before i do that, though, i wanted to take issue with this:
…Bi’s don’t understand this because they have no out, proud gay identity…
actually, of the very few bisexually-identifed folks i’ve known and the many queer folks i know who aren’t gender-exclusive, i can’t think of one who didn’t have an “out, proud” queer identity. and i’d say about half have “out, proud, gay” or lesbian identities - that is, if bill’s willing to count “fag” and “dyke” identities as authentically ‘gay’ enough.
i won’t respond to the whole “they wonder…” bit except to say that it’s more or less the same move as claiming that ethnically mixed folks live in a state of uncertainty. as a pround mischling, i can attest: we don’t. except now and then when other folks make us deal with their anxieties about us, which are their own damn problem.
but anyway, back to the specifics…
most recently, the whole media flap that centered around the notion of “DL/down-low” was structured as a panic over men of color having sex with each other and with women. now, i tend to think that the whole teapot tempest was mostly a way for white folks to flip out about ‘oversexed’ men of color (and get some backup from less pale ‘cultural conservatives’). but the explicit panic was about people fucking on both [sic] sides of the gender line. in fact, a good chunk of what bill has said could’ve come right out of the right-wingers’ rants on the “DL” issue - i recall a lot of ‘if they’d just admit they’re gay, we wouldn’t mind at all’.
and much earlier, though revived to a degree during the “DL” flap, there was the whole ’sinister bisexual’ panic within the general sexpanic of the earlier years of the AIDS pandemic. ‘bisexuals’ then were the evil, sex-mad agents through which the virus would spread to the ‘general population’ [sic]. again, this was accompanied by ‘ordinary’ homophobia (of the ‘if they’d just stick to fucking other queers, us straights wouldn’t have to worry’ type) but distinct from it.
Bill Samuels
April 25th, 2007 at 3:56 am
What??!!!