Look folks. I’ll get right to the point.
Dr. King fought against race prejudice and Jim Crow segregation, right?
So why do so many of us American Jews pretend as though we’re really committed to his work? Isn’t racial segregation still the ‘in-house’ policy of American Judaism?
Black Jewish congregations have existed in the New World for no less than two hundred and fifty years. Now let that sink in for a moment. Over two hundred years. Yet any fair and honest observer will admit that even American Protestants have made more progress in intra-religious race relations than American Jews. (And that’s no small claim, given that the KKK embraces a Protestant Christian orientation!) At least American Protestants admit that black churches and white churches are indeed “Christian” churches. White Jewish organizations, however, often have difficulties admitting or acknowledging the mere existence of black Jewish organizations as “Jewish” in the first place. Many white Jewish rabbis, educators and community leaders have never set one foot into a black synagogue or learned about black jewish organizations, and many of our community’s predominantly white institutions function to the complete exclusion of their black counterparts.
American Judaism’s racial segregation, a segregation in such full force and willful perpetuation that I must occasionally argue that its black underside even exists, stands as a continual reminder of American Judaism’s inability to live out the meaning of Dr. King’s dream of human equality and interracial harmony.
FACT: American Judaism is more racially segregated today, in the 21st century, in the year 2009, than it was during all the antebellum centuries of New World slavery.
Today… in the 21st century… in year 2009…
Demographic research on American Jewry still systematically excludes the vast majority of Jews of African descent.
Today… in the 21st century… in year 2009…
Historical scholarship on Judaism still systematically neglects and almost completely ignores the cultural and religious contributions of African-American Jews to American Judaism.
Today… in the 21st century… in year 2009…
Rabbinical councils and other Jewish leadership organizations remain racially segregated, and many Jewish professional organizations still cater only to Jews of European descent.
Today… in the 21st century… in year 2009…
American Jewish day schools and Hebrew schools still overwhelmingly teach Ashkenazi-centered and European-centered versions of Jewish history and culture, sometimes even to the complete exclusion of Afro-Asian Jews from students and faculty personnel.
Today… in the 21st century… in year 2009…
There still exists vast, visible and complex socioeconomic disparities between white and non-white American Jews.
And as a result, today…
An ecumenical, religiously inclusive and vibrantly multiracial American Judaism still stands as only a distant possibility.
By simply mentioning these few issues, we have only begun to scratch the surface of talking about American Jewish race relations.
But Dr. King understood that mere talk about racism has never amounted to a fight against racism.
What would Dr. King make of this situation, were he here to witness how his dream has unfolded in Jewish America?
What do you think he would say?
“Yes, my Jewish brother! Yes, my Jewish sister! It’s easy to talk about Ethiopian Jews’ struggles against racism in Israel, but how often do you talk about Black American Jews’ or Asian American Jews’ struggles against racism at your local JCC, or the local synagogue, or the local Jewish day school?
Yes, it’s convenient to talk about how Rabbi Heschel marched hand-in-hand with me during the Freedom Movement.
But how often do Ashkenazi rabbis march hand-in-hand with African-American rabbis on your own local rabbinical councils… or how often do Euro-American synagogues worship hand-in-hand or side-by-side with African-American synagogues? How can it be that hundreds of Black Jewish congregations (including the ones in your own home town) go unnoticed, unsupported and virtually neglected by your white Jewish organizations year after year after year? How is this anything but religiously sanctioned, Jewish Jim Crowism?”
If Dr. King uttered these questions, how would we respond?
Look, during this time of reflection, let us not as American Jews deceive ourselves. Let us no be quick to dismiss racism’s influence because we ourselves are too afraid to admit its role in our own lives.
Instead, we need to be honest about the racial apartheid practiced right here in American Jewish society.
Challenging the injustice of racial segregation in our own community is what provides us with the moral courage to challenge injustices in other communities– not the other way around.
And so this year, as we once again mark the importance of Dr. King’s legacy, the challenge for us to return to our own Jewish spheres of influence, with our own struggles with race prejudice, presses itself upon us. This time in a renewed commitment to the struggle for racial equality right here in our communities of American Judaism.
This is not a task from which we can always run. History will ultimately bring us our day of racial reckoning. And in the meantime, when we think about the precious memory of the Civil Rights Struggle, though a part of us may still not want to believe it, let’s at least have enough moral courage to admit the obvious: American Judaism–much like many other American religious traditions–is deeply, deeply racist.
And in all probability, it will be so for a long, long time.
If you want to honor the memory of Dr. King, and like me, you’re proud of your American Jewish roots, let’s start realizing his dream by being honest about how far we’ve fallen short in achieving it.
Please note: since August 2010, JVoices has ceased publishing new work. We hope you enjoy the articles that remain live as an archive and trusted resource of bold Jewish writing of our time.
Hadassah Harrell
January 22nd, 2009 at 12:01 pm
This is so very true about racism in Judaism. And this even happens in ISRAEL. Now, when we (Jews of color) speak up against racist attacks. They try to put the guilt trip on us to shut up. And they put us it the Lashon Hara bag. Here is a respond to an email, post I sent today to another list.
“RABBIS ARE ALREADY SPREADING LASHON HARA, WHEN SAYING, ‘JEWS OF COLOR ARE NOT AUTHENTICALLY JEWISH. THEY ARE GERES AND BLACK HEBREWS.’ DO YOU CONDONE RABBIS SPREADING LASHON HARA? If not add them to your email list to stop spreading/teaching lashon hara aka lies about Jews of color in the Yeshivas, synagogues etc.
And my husband had an experience in Israel around Purim about a year or so ago in Jerusalem. The man said to my husband Yosef,”I am suppose to kiss the gere (referring that to my husband).
Another incident happened to him in Israel 3 years ago in Bukarian section of Jerusalem: While returning from the post office a gang of Black Coats aka Ultra Orthodox Jews surrounded him. One called my husband over to him said,”I am going to give you the police.” My husband while pulling out his Israeli ID answered, “What is the police going to do to me?” Then, that Black Coats gang, backed away from him and the ringleader said,”Salicah Adoni”. Yosef answered, “No salicah, I am your brother and you were going to kill me.”
And even, I receives plenty racism here. A rabbi constantly lies by saying, “Hadassah I have some work for you.” And he never keeps his word. Last time he sent me an email with a Windows Live Message which almost messed up my computer with so-called work. Note: On Yom Kippur they do the Kol Nidre after doing dirt tricks on us all year round.
I let him know the Kol Nidre is not going to protect a lying rabbi like you. And my husband Yosef told him, “Your continue lying can cause your children to be a liar just like you. And you are a poor example for a rabbi. And HASHEM does not clear the guilty.” After that remark on Yahoo Messenger, he was clicking wickedly off and on Yahoo Messenger.
Lynne Arons
January 22nd, 2009 at 12:10 pm
I don’t think it is racism, It think it is ignorance of the actual facts. As we move farther away from the Holocaust generation, American Judaism will be able to look outside of survuval and back to the diversity and cultureal breadth of Judaism.
IFF Network Blog » Blog Archive » A Great Moment to Reflect
January 22nd, 2009 at 3:45 pm
[...] Lately I’ve seen a lot of Jewish bloggers discussing this issue. Y-Love discusses White Privilege in a Jewish Context. Walter Isaac writes On Dr. King’s Legacy and American Jewish Segregation: A Moment of Honesty. [...]
Walter Isaac
January 23rd, 2009 at 7:27 am
Lynne, I think I understand your point. It is true that a certain ontological shock to American Jewish culture has taken place as a direct result of the Holocaust generation’s experience of anti-Jewish genocide. However, evasions of racism come in many different forms. I’d caution you (and myself and perhaps others who may be reading our exchange) against confusing ignorance of facts with racism. There are many, many educated racists in the world. It was my hope in writing this article to discourage us from evading discussions about American Judaism and its racially exclusive incarnations. Now of course, ignorance may certainly be a by-product of racism. But they are not the same, and ignorance certainly doesn’t explain American Jews’ practice of racial segregation. The truth is that American Jews know very well that Black Jews exist. Very few born-and-raised American Jews will tell you nowadays that it is impossible for a person to be African, or Asian and Jewish. Most white Jews also know very well that African American Jews exist in this country. The problem, however, emerges when that knowledge must be applied to the execution of Jewish community and cultural life in America. Let me give you an example.
A black, male and Jewish friend of mine visited a synagogue one Friday night. The congregation, I think, was liberal and Reform in orientation. Rather than anyone speaking to him or greeting him with one word at all, they called on the authorities and he was escorted out of the synagogue by the police. Now what’s interesting, and what I’d like to emphasize, was that this young man did nothing but sit down inside the synagogue and begin to read a prayer book in preparation for worship services. He caused no outrageous disturbances. He harassed no one. He wasn’t dressed inappropriately. According to him, when approached by the police, he was actually wearing a kippah and tallit… Now think very carefully about that moment. A young man is sitting in a sanctuary of worship and he is then tapped on the shoulder from behind. He turns around and standing over him–the first person in the synagogue to which he must talk–is a city police officer…
This is racism, not ignorance, Lynne. I use this example to illustrate my point about how we American Jews still patrol the boundaries of racial segregation in our communities. “Ignorance” doesn’t explain the behavior of either the whites or the young black male in this story. Because the worship service, a space allegedly open to the public–Jews and non-Jews alike–was being attended by him, what was it that the white Jews in this situation didn’t know that would have altered their behavior?.. (Think about it. He didn’t have to be Jewish in this context, yet he was still asked to leave.)
Now where I think your point about ignorance has the most saliency is in the fact that many white Jews don’t “know” how common these experiences are in American jewish society. And in many respects, Jews of color have a responsibility to be honest about the frequency of experiences that carry the exact same structural features of this true story I’ve just relayed. And let’s face it… Knowledge about blacks really isn’t the problem. Many Americans know plenty of facts about black people—- and are still afraid of the ones they see in the city park or on the street… White jews could learn a whole slew of facts about black jews and their culture and congregations… and still be deathly afraid when they see a group of them coming along. No, there is something much deeper at work in human beings when racism is at play. And… at least I would argue… it’s the exact same thing that is at work when discussions of sexism or homophobia are taken seriously. It has to do with what type of human existence we choose to live–or many times in the case of blacks and women, whether we choose to live at all if living requires our participation in a world that demands our absence… Ironically, this is the very ontological shock you mention in your response, the ontological shock that is faced by the holocaust generation. If anything, discussion about jewish racism should take place before that generation passes away, not after. I believe they have something to teach us about the dangers of confusing an educated society with a non-racist one.
rozele
January 23rd, 2009 at 12:50 pm
Lynne:
part of Walter Isaac’s point, i believe, is that this kind of actively chosen and carefully taught ignorance is a very clear case of structural racism. it’s perfectly possible for a person who expresses perfectly standard liberal ‘color-blindness’ to participate in and perpetuate racist behaviors and attitudes of exactly the sort Issac describes.
furthermore, as most jewish education in the u.s. is increasingly restricted to describing the nazi attempted genocide and cultivating unquestioning support for the state of israel, i very much doubt that distance from the personal experience of the 1930s-40s will make much difference by itself. to the degree that most jewish children and youth are taught nothing but moses hitler and ben-gurion, the kind of isolationist, racist culture that Issac describes will continue to define ‘mainstream’ jewish life in the u.s. in fact, even the narrative of the khurbn* that is taught to jewish an non-jewish youth in the u.s. is an amazingly ashkenazi-centric version: when was the last time you heard about the destruction of the sefardic community of salonika? the survival of the sefardim of bulgaria? the near-annihilation of the krymchak communities of the crimea?
Hadassah –
i’m surprised that you say racism against jews of color and non-ashkenazim occurs “even” in israel. a basic premise of zionism is ‘shelilat hagalut’, ‘the negation of the diaspora’, meaning the destruction of diasporic jewish cultures and their replacement by a ‘universal’ ‘hebrew’ culture. a ‘universal’ culture which happened to be shaped by the assimilated european founders of the movement into the image of the german imperial culture they admired. as herzl said, only in a jewish state (one he also described as “a miniature england”) could jews become “true germans”. the zionist founders made central to their movement not only the (racist) hostility towards eastern european ashkenazim (“Ostjüden”), but the far more vicious racism towards african, middle eastern and asian peoples (including jews) that their german and english models espoused.
small wonder, then, that the the state they founded treats its sefardi/mizrakhi majority as second-class citizens, its african-descended jewish citizens as third-class, and its non-jewish citizens as fourth-class on a good day. zionism’s desire for the destruction (“liquidation”, in jabotinsky’s words; “negation” in the more popular euphemism) of diasporic jewish communities and cultures is very strongly implicated in the current forms of u.s. jewish racism, both towards jews of color and non-ashkenazim and towards non-jewish arabs, african-americans, and other communities of color.
rozele
January 23rd, 2009 at 1:14 pm
[forgot my footnote ]
* i use the yiddish “khurbn” to refer to the nazi attempted genocide because it seems to me the best of a pretty bad set of choices. “holocaust” is a christian term which quite directly describes mass murder as a justifiable, even praiseworthy, sacrificial offering to god. “shoah”, a term created by the zionist movement and popularized by the israeli government, disconnects the attempted genocide from the lived experience of its targets, very very few of whom were zionists, and almost none of whom spoke ivrit/’modern hebrew’. “khurbn”, though its yiddish form makes it an ashkenazi-oriented term, was the word used by most survivors in the immediate aftermath of the war. as a word rooted in loshn koydesh (scriptural hebrew & aramaic), it exists in slightly different forms in other jewish languages, linking our communities, and connects the experience to previous destructions of jewish communities (the WWI massacres known as the ‘khurbn galitsia’, for instance).
Sandra
January 25th, 2009 at 11:40 am
Walter et al.
As a Jew of African descent living in the south I do believe this is racism albeit racism in the 21st century. Thank you all for this discussion
Jordan Berg
January 25th, 2009 at 7:10 pm
Thank you thank you for this post.
Black Jew.net
Adam Levick
January 29th, 2009 at 1:41 am
So, American Jews…oh, I’m sorry, “white Jews” are horribly racist, practice Jim Crowism and enforce a racial apartheid within the community? I’d know how to respond if there was even a hint of substance to the piece…you know, footnotes, empirical evidence, actual examples of black Jewish congregations who have been excluded from the Reconstructionist, Reform, Conservative, or Orthodox Communities due to their race – you know, those boring facts which are used by journalists to support an argument. Instead, we’re left with nothing but a diatribe…a very sophomoric attack on the character of the American Jewish community. I guess that, in the racialist world you live in, any accusation of racism, no matter how unhinged, is credible and anyone who actually takes issue with such a charge is….wait, let me guess, a racist, right-winger, or reactionary. Well, I think the charge that the American Jewish community practices racial apartheid, and is guilty of Jim Crowism, is nothing but shameful defamation. The (white) Jews that I know – and I know a lot – are decent and moral people, who remain passionately committed to social and racial justice, and the broader principle of Tikkun Olam. In short, the American Jewish community (who makes up less than 2% of the American population) is one of the smallest minority groups in the country, and continues to face anti-Semitic tropes among respectable “progressives” about their “disproportionate” power in the country, the “injurious” power of the “Israel lobby”, and other such charges, and doesn’t need to defend itself from such flimsy accusations from within the community that they are systemically racist. The obscene UN declaration, in 1975, stating that Zionism is Racism was repealed in 1991, but the rhetorical and intellectual influence of that charge still can be felt today. The last thing we need is to advance a equally pernicious narrative about American Jews. Painting with broad strokes is always wrong, even if you’re a “progressive.”
rozele
January 29th, 2009 at 4:14 am
Adam:
you might try reading the piece Walter Isaac wrote, rather than the one you’ve invented as a straw man. or even looking back through the many past posts on JVoices dealing with questions of exclusion of jews of color and non-ashkenazim in u.s. jewish contexts and jewish communities more generally.
or perhaps even read a book. try the work of loolwa khazzoom, ella shohat or melanie kaye/kantrowitz, all of whom have been writing on these issues for many years. or just about any writer on the mizrakhi and ethiopian jewish experiences with the israeli state.
whether zionism is inherently racist or not has nothing to do with this subject, incidentally. zionism can be racist or not, and white ashkenazi jews in the u.s. can support it or not, without there being any neessary implications for the ‘mainstream’ (white, ashkenazi) jewish institutions participation in the structural racism that pervades u.s. society.
though it is certainly interesting to consider what an ideology based on the “shelilat hagalut” (“negation of the diaspora”, or “liquidation of the diaspora” in jabotinski’s more honest translation) imperative to eliminate all existing jewish cultural diversity has to do with hostility towards the recognition of the multiplicity of jewish cultures. (and also what it has to do with your hostility towards the wide range of jewish political opinion.)
while you’ve gratuitously dragged israel into yet another discussion of u.s. jewish life, though…. as a post-script, it seems worth pointing out that pretty much all of the recent political debate around the ‘israel lobby’ has spent quite a lot of time making it clear how unimportant u.s. jews are to the u.s. government’s support of israel. the main voice arguing for the large influence of u.s. jews in that area – as compared to the influence of the arms industry, the oil industry, the christian right, neo-conservative anti-arab racists, ‘clash of civilizations’ true believers, et cetera – is AIPAC, which describes itself as “America’s leading pro-Israel lobby”. personally, i think that’s patently false as long as the other players i mentioned are in the game, but if you’re looking to place blame for misconceptions on the subject, you don’t have to go any farther than the jewish right.
Adam Levick
January 30th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
In all due respect, I didn’t create a straw man. Isaac specifically accused the American Jewish community of practicing “Jim Crowism” and racial apartheid. These charges are obscene, and I’m amazed that anyone can defend such defamation. If there have been individual instances of Jewish communities not being as welcoming to African-American Jews (instances that have somehow escaped the radar of the media), then please…let’s have a discussion about how to address such individual injustices. But, can we please have such discussions with some sense of proportion, without hyperbole, and without painting the (white) Jewish community with such a broad brush? I don’t think this is an unreasonable request.
Walter Isaac
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:51 pm
Hi Adam. What I say in my article is not obscene. Even appeals to “facts” can disguise racial segregation if contemporary research excludes African-Americans from the Ameri-Jewish demographic in consideration. What facts are you looking to learn about? I’m open to discussing any specific question about American Jewish segregation you may have. I’m also sympathetic to your invitation to have a discussion about individual acts of discrimination. However, as you indicate, the point of the piece was to emphasize the institutionalized and communal aspects of American Jewish racism. It is in this context that I think discussions of individual acts of prejudice make the most sense. However, I think rozele’s point is that you seem to ignore some of the most basic social facts presented in my article— such as the segregated nature of American Jewish leadership. (Historians Jacob R. Marcus, Eli Faber, Bertran Korn, Jonathan Schorsch, Graenum Berger and others have all documented how many antebellum and post-bellum Jewish organizations established policies effectively barring Afro-Jews from participation. What aspects of this history are you interested in knowing about?.. I’d be happy to write another piece on it.) If statistical research on present-day American Judaism is what you’re looking for, you’re going to have trouble locating scholarship that presumes the existence of a black jewish community in the first place. Instead, you must look at a variety of issues– not only what contemporary social research on American judaism includes… but also what it excludes. Take Jewish demographic research, for example. For many years, demographers consulted established jewish institutions such as Jewish Federations, synagogues, religious and communal service agencies, etc. for information about how many jews their organizations served. The problem, however, was that most black jews didn’t participate in these organizations because of the discrimination they experienced. This is an aspect of American jewish history that’s difficult to find in scholarship because scholarship itself is often demarcated along racial lines.
So please feel free to be more specific in what you’d like to know. But remember, “facts” often depend on who’s writing them and on the basis of what research they decide to include or exclude.
Walter Isaac
February 3rd, 2009 at 10:03 am
oh… you’re welcome jordan… you’re very welcome sandra.
my pleasure.
Adam Levick
February 6th, 2009 at 12:56 am
Mr. Isaac,
If you believe in the postmodern notion that ““facts” often depend on who’s writing them…”, then there probably isn’t a good chance we can engage in meaningful conversation about our disagreement. My politics are based on a belief in reason and the power of empirical evidence. As such, when someone makes a claim about a group people who have been maligned as much as Jews, I usually demand that such a charge be proven beyond some anecdotal evidence…namely, more than a few examples of the alleged behavior. If you’re alleging that racist behavior is indeed systemic within the Jewish community, then I think that it is reasonable to ask for some extroidinary proof.
For instance, just as some Jews are indeed cheap, doesn’t mean that most or all Jews are cheap. Likewise, just because there have been a some examples of white Jews excluding Jews of color from their organizations and institutions (and I’m still waiting for examples of such official exclusion) doesn’t mean that such a phenomenon is universal or pervasive. Just as I wouldn’t make a generalization about the anti-Semitic attitudes of S. Africans because that nation’s Deputy Foreign Minister recently accused Jews of using their money to control the governments of the United States and Europe (http://blog.z-word.com/2009/01/south-african-deputy-foreign-minister-jewish-money-controls-america/), I would ask that you refrain from making quite severe accusations about white Jews (Jim Crowism, apartheid, etc.) based on very little evidence.
Adam
TTMN
February 6th, 2009 at 2:37 am
Adam, what I find intriguing is that often, in particular, with issues of discrimination, people place the burden on those who are calling these issues out to give “empirical evidence” or “proof” in a way that eases people like yourself from wanting to truly look at a systematic issue. You say you’re willing to talk about individual actions, but unwilling to acknowledge or really account for the systemic issues Walter raises.
So, what if we were to flip the equation. Instead of placing all the onus of proof on Walter, even after he’s outlined a fairly cogent argument in my opinion, why don’t you show us evidence that proves that the majority of U.S. Jewish institutions do not participate in, for example, Jewish education in which Ashkenazi Jewish history and culture isn’t at the center. That the predominant schools that train Jewish educators do an effective job in not reinforcing Ashkenazi culture as at the center. Is that something you can show us? And if not, why do you not ask the same of these institutions that you’re quickly coming to defend without asking them these very same questions? Or are you asking them these questions? Are you holding them to the same scrutiny? If so, then good.
It’s not “postmodern” to outline that the very research you are asking for isn’t as readily available when demographers didn’t do the work to include Jews of color in their research. That’s just, again, part of the institutional racism and discrimination Walter is bringing forward. It’s too bad that, rather than attempting to work with scholars like Walter who are wanting to shift these dynamics, you’re quick to condemn.
Walter Isaac
February 7th, 2009 at 11:50 pm
Hi Adam. Why didn’t you respond to my question if you were sincere? What is it specifically that you’d like to know more about… either historically or present-day… concerning intra-race relations in American Judaism? I’ll be happy to write another article on more specific issues concerning segregation in American Jewish life. I already mentioned that information on this topic is available thru very reputable works of other scholars. My point about facts was not a postmodern appeal. It was little more than a cautionary hint that we all should be critical when engaging the scholarly information and data available to the general public.
But in my opinion, reading books and articles about racial segregation in American Judaism doesn’t address Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr’s challenge for us. Instead, the best way to learn about segregation is to experience it. Have you experienced segregation in American Judaism, Adam?.. (This is not a rhetorical appeal. I’m seriously asking, because I think how you respond to that question will say a lot about how meaningful conversations about Jewish racism will or will not be to you.)
If you tell me simply that you have not personally witnessed any segregation in American Jewish life, I could understand your shock at my article. But I didn’t write the article out of hatred or prejudice, Adam. I wrote it in the spirit of Dr. Martin L. King, Jr’s honor. Dr. King fought against segregation, because he believed there was something about segregation–ALL forms of segregation–that was fundamentally misanthropic. I happen to agree with him, Adam. Many times, people learn to live their lives on one and only one side of the railroad tracks. When comfortable living on their side of the tracks, people tend to believe their side is the only side that exists or is the only side that’s really important. But sometimes, people can take advantage of opportunities to admit that there is another side to those railroad tracks. And that people really live on that other side, and that it may be worth finding out what that other side is like. I’ve conducted interracial dialogue seminars both in and out of the Jewish community for over ten years, and in my work I’ve noticed that it is usually an unwillingness to acknowledge the mere existence of the other side that leads to racial misconceptions, racial distortions and ultimately… racism itself.
I know people such as yourself, Adam, take issue with my description of “Jewish Jim Crowism” as one manifestation of America’s history of racial apartheid. However, I think your criteria of “extraordinary proof” would easily be met if you walked in the shoes of people who live the underside of the reality I’m describing. If you want to know what I always personally mean by the term “segregation,” please consult a small tract by former yale professor C. Vann Woodward. It’s called “The Strange Career of Jim Crow.” In it Woodward has a detailed definition and description of Jim Crow-style racial segregation in the United States. My contention is that American Judaism has overwhelmingly followed the racial norms, not the exceptions, of religious behavior in the united states.
Adam Levick
February 8th, 2009 at 1:40 am
Well, unfortunately I didn’t attend Hebrew school, or any other Jewish school, as a child so I don’t know if I can provide much info on whether Sephardic Jewish history, to use only one example, was routinely included. (or the history of Jews of Color moreover)
More broadly, however, I don’t think, in the context of this conversation, the burden of proof should be on me to prove that white Jews DON”T engage in systemic oppression against Jews of color since Mr. Isaac was the one making the charge and I think its reasonable to assume that the burden of proof in this debate should be on him to prove that white Jews and their institutions are indeed systemically racist – again, he clearly felt comfortable in the veracity of the charge since he used quite loaded terms such apartheid and Jim Crowe. I’d have a hard time proving a negative – that Jews aren’t racist to the degree Isaac claims – but can only testify on the admittedly limited number of Jews of Color I’ve known in the Philadelphia Jewish community I’ve been a part of – all of whom, again, as far as I know, were treated quite warmly by the congregation, and seemed to feel very much included in the community. Now, maybe you would argue that this is an anomaly, but I would like to know, again, what exactly leads you to this conclusion?
For instance, in arguing that white Jews are especially racist – more than average whites, if you’re making such a claim – then it would seem reasonable to ask if you have any social science date to verify this argument. For instance, ADL conducts surveys each year on the anti-Semitic attitudes of people in the U.S. and in other countries. As such, though its difficult to exactly quantify someone’s level of hate with the same degree of accuracy as say measuring someone’s temperature, such polls, taken year after year (similar in methodology to political polls which were taken during the recent election) do provide a barometer to public attitudes concerning Jews. So, ADL knows the level of anti-Semitic belief among people based on certain economic/educational groups, ethnic groups, and nations.
So, at the very least, does SPLC, for instance have at its disposal similar public research on racism within various religious or ethnic groups within the U.S.? And, does such research confirm your allegation that white Jews practice pervasive racism – or, at least, hold racist views which are greater than other groups?
I think these are reasonable questions. Perhaps it wouldn’t completely answer your question, but it would be a good start to at least begin to bring empirical evidence to bolster our claims.
Thanks,
Adam
Walter Isaac
February 9th, 2009 at 9:52 am
This is much more than just a reasonable question, Adam. It’s a tremendously important question, and I seriously commended you for asking it. Thanks. I’ll repeat it below for everyone…
ADAM: “…..at the very least, does SPLC, for instance have at its disposal similar public research on racism within various religious or ethnic groups within the U.S.? And, does such research confirm your allegation that white Jews practice pervasive racism – or, at least, hold racist views which are greater than other groups?….”
ME: In short, the answer is “no.” The Southern Poverty Law Center has for many years been at the frontline of prosecuting civil rights violations. However, the SPLC’s work has always respected the principle of separation between church and state. As a result, racial segregation that goes on behind the doors of churches and synagogues has been a problem that usually lay beyond their reach. There has been a great deal of scholarly research on the relationship between race and American religion in general. But unfortunately, little work has been done on this more specific area of race and American Judaism. The best social scientific work available was published by Gary and Diane Tobin at the Institute for Jewish and Community Research (order their book, “In Every Tongue”; it’s a demographic study of racial attitudes and practices in American Judaism.) The IJCR’s work is very good in comparison to most studies of Jews and race in America. However, it does not focus on American Judaism’s racial segregation, in particular. I am one of the few scholars who has studied the latter in detail. So the reason your question is so pertinent and important, Adam, is that it shows us a severe weakness in where our civil rights organizations are able to go about their work. In our country, racism has always hidden itself behind a curtain of religious freedom. Technically, we are free to practice racial exclusion if we can make such exclusion a feature of our religious faith. “So why is this racial, either racism or racial segregation?” you may ask (as opposed to, say, simply ethnic religious fundamentalism).
Well, first of all, the result is quite obviously racial segregation. There are plenty of black synagogues that embrace the ideals of liberal Judaism, yet are completely segregated from those of white, progressive Judaism. On the other hand, there are many more black synagogues that embrace the teachings of traditional Judaism, yet are totally isolated in that world also. (This can be easily verified by engaging in a calculated “synagogue-hopping” excursion on any given Saturday in any major metropolis in the U.S.)
But second, and perhaps more importantly, the data suggests this is the case. I’m not an ethnographer. I’m more of a historian, but I have worked with ethnographers on this topic for many years. In our research at the Center for Afro-Jewish Studies, we’ve relied on interviews, surveys, case-studies, documentaries, etc… and noticed a disturbing tendency… When there were little or no religious differences (in doctrine and practice) between white and black Jews, not only did the number of reports of discrimination climb, the types of experiences with discrimination became more acutely hostile. In other words, black Jews tended to experience discrimination in different ways depending on where they found themselves. Non-whites who stayed in a predominantly white Jewish communities tended to experience occasional acts of discrimination, particularly when forced to interact with white Jews, such as when visiting a non-familiar (predominantly white) Jewish community or when seeking to marry an Orthodox spouse in a predominantly white Jewish community. To our surprise, however, Black Jews who lived and worshipped in predominantly Black Jewish contexts experienced much less discrimination, usually outside of the Jewish community–often at work or in other segments of the black community. Over time, a picture began to emerge in our research that dismissed the notion that racial separation in the Jewish community is only ethnic particularism at work. Black Jews who stayed within their own Black Jewish communities reported far less traumatic incidents of prejudice than did those Black Jews who did not. The Jews of color who practiced Judaism in predominantly white contexts often held the same religious beliefs as their white Jewish counterparts, yet reported experiences with discrimination in greater numbers and with more formative impact than those Black Jews who grew up only in Black Jewish contexts. Now when we crossed referenced our ethnographic research with my historical research into the establishment and maintenance of racial dynamics in American Jewish organizations, we noticed a clear and distinct pattern of endorsing racial segregation in Judaism–even in the history of highly respected and relatively prominent organizations… such as the American Jewish Committee or the New York Board of Rabbis. Now before I am once more accused of defaming my own people, I want you to both read the Tobins’ research on the topic (a part of which I’ve summarized above) and re-consider a couple of things that have already been stated.
ADAM: “…..the burden of proof in this debate should be on him to prove that white Jews and their institutions are indeed systemically racist – again, he clearly felt comfortable in the veracity of the charge since he used quite loaded terms such apartheid and Jim Crowe.”
ME: Loaded terms? Why is this such a problem? Everyone knows or at least I hope they know that I and other essayists write in order to convey a message. “Jim Crow” is the generic term we use to describe America’s particular history of racial segregation (or “apartheid”). And it’s common knowledge that racial segregation has been normative in American religion. The situation I described about American Judaism has not been unheard of in other American communities of faith, and by these terms, I’m only referring to the forced, physical separation of people and groups for reasons of race. Are you shocked at my use of these terms because you make an association of them with lynchings and other manifestations of hate? There is a huge difference, however, between racism and racial hatred, although the former often breeds the latter. I thought the reason I brought up “Jim Crowism” would have been obvious: the article was meant to remind us of the radical humanistic thrust of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream. And Dr. King fought against “Jim Crow” segregation, in all its incarnations–including those with which we’re complicit. This is a point rozele was mentioning earlier– about how liberal and educated folk such as myself may also find ourselves practicing racism by sheer virtue of our participation in its institutional dimensions. In other words, we don’t have to be members of a hate group to be racist. We don’t have to lynch or threaten people. All we need do, for example, is sit back and relax when segregation is at work.
I can, rhetorically speaking, guarantee you that the Jews of color you knew in Philadelphia were accepted in their communities… but not completely. There have always been Jews of color in the Americas who were happy and content with their place in the community. This, in my opinion, is not an anomaly. It simply doesn’t address the issue I raised about racial segregation in American Judaism. Consider this… About four or five years ago, I happened to live in Philadelphia. (My wife and I live in Cincinnati now.) Before I moved to Philly, however, I called the Jewish Federation there and asked if they could direct me to any predominantly black synagogues. However I was repeatedly told that no such congregations whatsoever, to their knowledge, existed… that they had been conducting work in the Philadelphia Jewish community for generations and that if something like that existed, they would know… But a couple of weeks later, during my first weekend stay in Philly, I found myself observing Shabbat inside a predominantly African-American synagogue with a membership of over 700 families.
Now I know this story may sound like an insignificant, anecdotal experience having little to do with widespread racial segregation. But in our research– that is, in the absence of many nation-wide social scientific studies, case references like this are quite revealing. Think about it, Adam… If you, for example, were a member of the only synagogue in town. And your synagogue had over 700 families. And someone called the Jewish Federation and asked about synagogues, particularly of your kind. And they were told, over and over again, that no such synagogue existed… what would you begin to think? Now understand, I’m not saying that this one black synagogue I attended represents all black Jews. (There are actually over twenty Black Jewish congregations in Philly.) Rather, I’m saying this experience alone calls for an explanation. I’m saying that under those circumstances, there is an undeniable type of separation, a disconnect, existing between the Federation and your synagogue. To explore the nature of the disconnect, one need only examine the particular features of your synagogue– in my case, it was the fact that the synagogue was black.
Now I would never argue that somehow Jews (or any other group of people, for that matter) are inherently more predisposed to racism. That’s ridiculous. But if you re-read my article, you’ll notice that I try very hard to insist that other religious groups such as Protestants have made much more significant progress in the organization of “ecumenical, religiously inclusive and vibrantly multiracial” communities of faith. By such terms I mean the establishment of spaces –physical, institutional, organizational spaces– that are not marked by racial exclusion. This can be seen by the amount of money and turmoil being experienced by traditional Protestant organizations in their attempt to integrate. (Again, not to idealize Protestants. My point is that they’ve cultivate organizations to try to deal with their institutionalized forms of segregation. They, like us, have a long, long way to go, but as a result of the Christian indigenization movements, the liberation theology movements and the ecumenical movements, today the fastest growing Protestant congregations are racially integrated ones– a far cry from the Protestantism of 1965. To date, American Judaism has not shown the same degree of change, despite the fact that demographic changes amongst American Jews reflect the demographic changes amongst other subethnicities. This is the point of the Tobins’ research… Citing the visible shift in the number of what they call “diverse Jews,” the IJCR wants to promote more multicultural and diversity initiatives in Jewish organizations, initiatives that look very much like those adopted by many Protestant–particularly liberal Protestant–groups.)
In my article, as evidence of the contrast between work in the Jewish community and work in Protestantism, I made the remark that Protestants no longer have debates about whether Afro-Christianities are indeed Christian. Allow me to elaborate.
For centuries, Protestant theologians struggled with the fact that black Christians embraced philosophies and religious practices that white christians didn’t. In other words, blacks were not orthodox enough, and this gave white Protestant theologians “Reason” to argue that Black churches were not legitimate manifestations of Christianity, that in fact they were heretical and that it was proper to keep black congregations separate from white ones. So an assumption that Black churches were always considered “Christian” organizations by white Churches is incorrect. But Black Protestant theologians responded by denying that white churches were Christian organizations and that racial segregation was contrary to Christianity. (Read the Rev. Henry Garnet’s “Address to the Slaves…”) I bring up this history, because I want to show how that debate is relatively absent amongst Protestants today. Protestant theologians don’t go around arguing whether Black churches are really Christian (and thus, deserving of the respect this entails.) And this is not to say that Protestant Christianity has fully recovered from its really disturbing history when it comes to race. My point is that such a debate is superfluous, because the “norm” in Protestantism has shifted to acknowledge the mere existence of Black Christians as indeed Christian– not cursed by Ham nor inspired by the devil nor, God-forbid, “non-Christian.” The same cannot be said in the world of American Judaism. Discussions–even “scholarly” ones about Black Jews in America almost invariably turn towards some type of discourse about whether or not Black jews really practice Judaism or whether they’re really Jewish or whether or not their conversions were legitimate… which, frankly, would be fine if those debates were really the mediating factors in Black Jews’ experiences of discrimination. My contention, Adam, is that our research shows this not to be the case. If anything, when Black Jews go thru all the conversions, practice all the laws and effectively become integrated into a predominantly white Jewish community, the personal experiences with discrimination increase, while the institutional barriers which created such a process of assimilation in the first place go uncorrected. This is how segregation operates, and I’m sure the SPLC has ample research data to support this structural account of the phenomenon.
The reason I mentioned Woodward’s study of Jim Crow has to do with a fact about American forms of segregation rarely talked about today– that is, its inculturation. Woodward noticed that a key component of Jim Crow racial segregation was its maintenance by tradition, that even in places where it was “legal” for blacks to integrate, they tended not to do so because they feared having to deal with the social (any sometimes physical) repercussions of violating the culturo-behavioral norms of segregation. To be blunt, Jim Crow segregation remained in play because many people of color were too afraid to integrate. To them, integration meant confrontation, and the threat of confronting whites had hovered over them for so long that the benefits of integration rarely outweighed the costs. As long as there was relative peace and whites weren’t bothering blacks, why integrate?.. Unfortunately, this is another lesson from the Civil Rights movement that isn’t spoken of enough… the fact that some Blacks felt Dr. King’s movement would be counterproductive. There actually were blacks who were happy with segregation–not because they believed segregation was right (they didn’t)– but because they believed the “separate but equal” doctrine did provide some measure of peace (at least more peace than there would be if blacks and whites were forced to live together). My point, Adam, is that there is a whole lot more to the story of Jim Crow segregation than lynchings and rapes. Because Jews aren’t going around lynching people today has little to do with whether or not they are drawing from the wellsprings of America’s historic practice of racial segregation (or “apartheid”). One colleague of mine, Andre Key, conducted a series of interviews amongst members of Philadelphia’s black Jewish community. Time and time again, the people he interviewed operated according to similar logic of the folks who were comfortable with Jim Crow segregation. They believed racial equality signaled by some degree of integration was the right thing to do, but on the other hand, they saw no need to participate in the dominant institutions in the Jewish community. There are about 25 different predominantly black congregations that practice Judaism in the Philadelphia metropolitan area. One of them–a congregation over 100 years old–is only three blocks or so from the Gershman Y. How many of them have you seen? Until Professor Key (another research fellow at the Center for Afro-Jewish Studies) began to conduct his ethnographic research, none of them had been consulted for research on racism in the broader Jewish community– not by the SPLC, the ADL or any other civil rights organization–probably for the reasons I mentioned above. So while I definitely agree with you that we should “begin to bring empirical evidence to bolster our claims,” I also believe that at a certain point, “claims” cease to be claims and must instead be considered accurate and evident depictions of social reality. Whether or not black and white Jews believe racial segregation to be right or wrong is not the issue I’m raising. My point is that regardless of American Jewry’s beliefs about race, what we by-and-large practice is the de facto segregation of Judaism along racial lines. The only empirical evidence needed to see this is to actually “see” it. And I admit, “seeing” can be difficult at times. But seeing is nonetheless essential. So to answer your first, original question above… “Unfortunately, no. And this is sad, because there is much work still to be done, even if it can only be done ‘in-house.’ ” Nevertheless, I highly recommend Gary and Diane Tobin’s research on the subject.
Walter Isaac
February 9th, 2009 at 10:02 am
BTW,
in my last comment, i mentioned our documentation of discrimination when people are forced to interact with white jews. this was not meant to demean anyone. my point was basically that jews of color tended to have to put forth extra effort in proving they belong to the jewish community when they found themselves in unfamiliar jewish surroundings. Black jews who stayed in their own community ran into this problem less frequently. in other words, i’m not arguing that white jews are more racist than other whites as much as i’m arguing that racism simply exists in our community.
Adam Levick
February 9th, 2009 at 10:18 am
No, as a “white” Jew, naturally I haven’t experienced racial segregation. But, I’ve never taken issue with the historical fact of racial segregation in this country…there’s no debate about this. I’ve read about it, studied it in college, and worked for several years for a prominent civil rights organization that fights discrimination of all kind – a largely white Jewish organization that condemned racial discrimination in all its forms long before the broader white community support it.
I am arguing with the claims in your original essay:
“Isn’t racial segregation still the ‘in-house’ policy of American Judaism?” Well, no. And, yes, I’d like to see these scholarly articles you talk of. My guess is that such a claim is based on a much different definition of racial segregation than what I’m talking about.
“Demographic research on American Jewry still systematically excludes the vast majority of Jews of African descent.”: Where is this research? Again, this is an extraordinary claim…how is it done systematically? That implies that there is a de facto policy in the organized Jewish community to exclude Jews of color. Is this your claim?
“How can it be that hundreds of Black Jewish congregations (including the ones in your own home town) go unnoticed, unsupported and virtually neglected by your white Jewish organizations year after year after year? How is this anything but religiously sanctioned, Jewish Jim Crowism?”: How are they excluded? Judaism, as you know, is organized by the various movements…Conservative, Reform, etc. So, are you saying that there are, for instance, Conservative African American synagogues (dozens, hundreds?) who aren’t admitted into the organizational umbrella of the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism?
“we need to be honest about the racial apartheid practiced right here in American Jewish society.” In all due respect, this is simply hyperbole.
The fact remains that Jews have, more than any other white ethnic/religious group, have consistently voted for the Democratic candidate…by often incredibly large margins, even as our incomes have risen…over the past 50 years, since the Democrats have been the party which supported civil rights for African Americans (at least in contrast with the Republicans). Other white ethnic groups have consistently voted for the Republicans. (And, Barack Obama recently picked up 78% of the Jewish vote based on exit polls)
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/jewvote.html
Finally, as someone who is white, of course I can’t speak of the pain when experiencing racism. However, as a Jew I can speak of the pain of anti-Semitism. As such, though you are Jewish, the accusations you make about the white Jewish community sounds hauntingly similar charges made by non-Jews about our community. (No, I’m not accusing you of being self-hating Jews…that would be absurd). The charges you make are similar in that they paint with an extraordinary broad brush, make use of hyperbole and other such rhetorical devices which make it impossible to defend against, and seems to advance narratives which are mere articles of faith – that is, opinions which seem to be held prior to any research or objective examination of the complex issues at hand.
I am extremely proud of the Jewish community, will not be on the defensive about our supposed sins, and will not walk around feeling ashamed, guilty, or apologetic.
Adam
Walter Isaac
February 11th, 2009 at 3:46 am
Let’s be honest here. “Broad Brush”?.. Adam, the article was about Dr. King’s “dream”, and it was written on Dr. Martin L. King, Jr. day. Segregation, we both know, is not the ONLY important thing about American Judaism. It is, however, something I feel concerned about, for obvious reasons. And so in the same respect I want to emphasize that we both know what racial segregation means. I am not re-defining it in some vague, unusual, incomprehensible sort of way. If you’ve studied segregation and worked for a civil rights organization, then you also know (or so I assume) that for segregation to exist, it need not advertise itself as racism or racial segregation. (i.e.–de facto segregation in housing). I also assume that you and I are both aware of the differences between racial “separation” and racial “segregation.” However, I would like to ask you how you are defining racial segregation. I’ve been thus far quite open about how I’m using my terms. You haven’t. I’ve given the names of no less than five or six different scholars and two books in reference to my information. You haven’t… that is, at least not in accusing me of how I “advance narratives which are mere articles of faith.” And you have yet to address my own point, which was also Woodward’s point… that Jim Crow segregation was never a unitary phenomenon, but rather a diverse array of “separate but equal” doctrines that were put into place throughout this country and sustained on the basis of custom as much as written law. Now if you disagree with this understanding of Jim Crow racial segregation, say so and say what you mean by it. Otherwise, your accusation that I “paint with an extraordinary broad brush” seems to be based on prejudice, not a critical examination of my assumptions. (And believe me, I WANT people such as yourself to critically examine my assumptions.)
By “in-house policy” I meant to convey the idea that American Judaisms have, for the most part, publicly articulated their opposition to racial discrimination, while practicing it within the confines of its own community. Why, for example, do you think the Philadelphia Jewish Federation had no knowledge of a 700 family synagogue located five minutes away from it? Wouldn’t you agree that such an oversight is significant? How would you account for it? After all, black synagogues have been in existence for over two centuries. And they didn’t emerge because relations between Jews of color and white Jews were fine and dandy. Is segregation “policy”? Well, yes…
The demographic research on American Jewry is on-going. But my claim that it systematically excludes Jews of African descent is not extraordinary. It’s systematic because it occurs by virtue of a process that’s predictable. Demographic research depends a great deal on institutions that have not appealed to Afro-Jews. (I mentioned this earlier– again, something you haven’t acknowledged). However, it also (depending on who conducts the research) depends on the cultural-linguistic paradigm of the target population. Earlier, you correctly mentioned the studies on Anti-Semitism. That those studies use associations and ideas is correct, yet those associations are based on discourses that have been “interpreted” as anti-Semitic for historical (and in my opinion, valid) reasons. Nevertheless… and this is a problem… you will be hard pressed to find a single demographic research project that has acknowledged and taken into consideration the differences in language and cultural practice between Euro-Jews and Afro-Asian Jews. The demography projects themselves are rooted in notions of Jewishness that may presume the centrality and essentiality of European Jewish identities. (But as you admit, you may want to see the research first in order to understand what I’m saying.)
Another problem is methodological corruption. Social scientific research should not be beholden to religious and theological disputes if the cultures engaged are not essentially religious and/or theological in content. (and yes, this is where things get tricky!) There are still people who believe secular Jews are not really Jews or are at least problematically Jewish. For such people, a theological discourse is essential to Jewish identitiy, and in nearly every major demographic study of American Judaism, theological commitments exert all-too controlling influences. For example, in Europe, traditional ethnic boundaries between Jew and non-Jew were indicated very well by doctrinaire statements. (“Christians believe in Jesus. Jews don’t.”) What’s fascinating (and again, something that demographers of American Judaism ignore) is that these assumptions about language do not hold as well when dealing with Afro-Asian Jewry. In other words, demographers have yet to account for the diversity of ways of “being Jewish” in America. I’ll use myself as an example. I’m a Hebrew-Israelite; however, not all Hebrew-Israelites are alike. We speak different languages, come from different countries and eat different foods. However, Hebrew-Israelites tend to not make very strong showings in demographies of American Judaism when the criteria of Jewish identity, as regards background and narrative, are virtually identical to that of (white) Jews. If the demographers, however, are doing their job, how can this be? The answer has to do with the fact that the assumptions about “Jewishness” are wrong, and those assumptions are based in European-centered notions of Jewish identity, etc. It’s a spiral of exclusion from research that reaches from the inside outward.
Now I want you to tell me (and please be specific…) what aspect of what I’m saying is unclear or unreasonable or held prior to research or objectivity. Read very, very carefully what I’ve been saying since the first e-mail. (And remember, of the two of us, I’m the one whose seen and conducted FAR more research on this topic.) If anything, what I’m saying is that the social scientists who study population shifts in American Jewish demography are not being objective enough, not the other way around.
Now again… How is segregation “policy”? (Unfortunately I must… one again… repeat myself.) #1. I gave a perfect example earlier. The one about the young man who was escorted out of a synagogue by the police. That story illustrates one way how Jewish spaces are “policed” along racial lines. #2. In another sense, there is the historical force of past decisions and rules. For example, between the 1960′s and the 1980′s, the American Jewish Committee co-sponsored various events and research projects to document and study Jews of color. Many of these projects were focused on the topic of conversion, assimilation, etc., and as a result, even though the AJC may not appeal to those precedents today, they had an impact on the Jewish community that could have reinforced, not relaxed, the codes of segregation. #3. By the “codes of segregation,” I mean the written and unwritten modalities of behavior that produced present-day cultures of segregation in American Judaism. For instance, a number of the earliest synagogues in the Americas (in Louisiana, Virginia, Georgia, South Carolina, Jamaica, Curacao, etc.) legislated that black jews and other jews of color be excluded from full membership in the jewish community. Those jews of color sometimes formed their own groups. By the mid-19th century, rabbis in north and south america (including those advocating Reform) were having arguments over the role freed slaves would play in the jewish community (especially considering that some rabbis were teaching that non-Jewish slaves, upon emancipation, should be considered jews according to halakha). Ultimately, the jewish community split along racial lines in more radical ways AFTER emancipation. In the united states, this split was broadly symbolized thru the emergence of Jim Crow. So to answer your question, it’s not that the Conservative movement has a written policy that black synagogues are not allowed into the organization (although for generations, it did require blacks to “convert” in order to be considered jews). My point is that the Conservative and Reform movements excluded blacks from day one (and this can be attested to by 18th and 19th century responsa over the role of black Jews in liturgy and synagogue membership). #4. A slew of independent reports of interactions between black jews and white jews have been preserved since the mid-19th century. For many years, the Reform and Conservative movements remained “on the fence” when it came to the interaction and/or segregation of black and white synagogues in AMerica. It has been thoroughly documented that the leaders of both movements were aware of the problem; however, there was always a sense of benign neglect with respect to its implications. #5. For years, my colleagues and I have been, for the first time, researching, recording and cataloguing racial segregation and discrimination in our community. So when you ask me to “prove” a “claim” about segregation… after I have befriended, interviewed, spoken face-to-face with, had dinner with, shared stories with and written down the insights of literally thousands of individuals in the Afro-Jewish community, I sit back and… chuckle.
These thoughts are not “articles of faith,” Adam. They are very basic realities about the history and culture of American Judaism. How many black synagogues or black rabbinical institutions or black hebrew schools have you encountered Adam? How many do you know of?.. We may have common friends… or at least a common experience visiting one segment of the black Jewish community. Let me know… If we don’t, then don’t presume I haven’t “proven” a case about segregation. Your life experiences simply are not broad enough to appreciate the blatant honesty of what I’m saying. And this is not to insult you or anyone else. Please don’t feel ashamed or guilty. I support you in not feeling that way. It’s not about that at all. My point is that all your reading is for naught if you aren’t willing to connect to other human beings that my broaden your perspective a little.
Look, I know this is a matter of both passion and fact. But the passion of Dr. King was not condemnatory of any particular group. Rather, it was condemnatory of certain, particular practices which any group may or may not embrace. I have experienced segregation in my own way. I didn’t step foot into a predominantly white synagogue until I was a teenager. We were “Hebrews” in my family, not “Jewish” people. (“Jewish” folks were some people from Europe. Although no one ever explained to me why the whites in my family could be considered “Jewish,” but not us.) You see, my friend, you studied about segregation in school. However, I personally believe you have also experienced it… the white side of it. The only claim I’m making is that another side exists. And again, reading limited reports on Jewish demography will not expose you to that side. You can do that if you want. In fact, i recommend it. But to get to that side about which I’m talking, you have to do what segregation discourages. You have to do what we’re doing here… Connecting with people who are different. Sharing your ideas. Being open to an other. And believe me… these things take a loooooong time for their existence to be openly and comfortably confessed. They take even longer to heal. I used to live in New Haven, CT, and I’ll never forget some of the lessons I learned there. After running back and forth literally for years, I finally rattled enough nerves in the Jewish community to get a sample of members from a Hebrew-Israelite synagogue and and predominantly white Reform synagogue to meet each other and do something so difficult and painful as… TALK!. (And frankly, it was the black Jews, for the most part, who didn’t want to talk. They didn’t feel like justifying their existence, and the white Jews didn’t realize when they were asking the black Jews to justify their existence!) My point is the same as Dr. King’s. What makes integration radical is that its success depends precisely upon the radical objectivity you say you want when you demand “evidence.” This is why when people ask me for books and articles, I instead encourage them to get to know their local black Jewish community instead. Yes, there’s a lot to learn (some good, mostly bad) from the literature that’s out there. But there are sources better than the studies of Jewish demography available at the main branch of your local public library. Instead of reading about black Jews or Asian-American Jews, perhaps it would be good to get to know the community (not just an individual). The community’s people, the community’s issues… these are the places where you’ll learn the most, and though I know it takes a lot of courage to step out of our comfort zones sometimes, perhaps allowing the community–the real, multiracial, multiethnic, multireligious or irreligious community– to articulate its own values (and simply being comfortable with that allowance) will help one understand one’s own values better. You are correct. You do not need to walk around feeling ashamed, guilty or apologetic. But before you accuse someone in another community of innaccurately describing significant aspects that community’s experiences, at least get to know the community first. I personally find it hard to believe that if you were in constant contact with the black jewish community, you’d find comments about segregation to be “held prior to any research or objective examination of the complex issues at hand.”
I’ll say it again… And this time, a little differently… and for the last time… In America, the vast majority of black and white jews do not function in the jewish community as an integrated union. And unlike the cases with sephardim / ashkenazim… or liberal / orthodox… it has occurred historically because of a direct relationship between America’s religious traditions and their demarcation of doctrine and practice along racial lines. This is not hyperbole, and if you’ve really “never taken issue with the historical fact of racial segregation in this country,” you’d be willing to admit its role in the establishment and history of our religious institutions as well… Judaism included. All I’m saying is that this history continues, and the notion that I would be accused of defamation for passionately and rhetorically encouraging my readers to simply acknowledge this fact also demonstrates how much work we have to do.
Adam Levick
February 11th, 2009 at 11:32 am
Mr. Isaac,
I agree that there is racism in our community.
Moreover, I enjoyed conversing with you in a respectful manner – unlike the frequent rudeness and vitriol in the comments section of many other political blogs.
Adam
daniel
February 11th, 2009 at 1:51 pm
Adam writes:
“Demographic research on American Jewry still systematically excludes the vast majority of Jews of African descent.”: Where is this research? Again, this is an extraordinary claim…how is it done systematically? That implies that there is a de facto policy in the organized Jewish community to exclude Jews of color. Is this your claim?
the typical ‘best practices’ of u.s. jewish demographic research are well illustrated by the UJA-Fed’s “Jewish Community Study”. just how bad those practices are, generally, can be seen by a quick read through its methodology section.
some highlights, through the lens of racial justice within jewish communities, are as follows. this is based on the 2002 survey, which i did a more extensive analysis of at that time for Jews for Racial & Economic Justice.
the basic structure is a phone survey, calling different numbers of lines in different neighborhoods, which were weighted in “a priori” decisions based on “pre-study estimates” of the expected population. the “estimates” were done based on UJA and JCRC phone lists, and on prevalence of stereotypically jewish (i.e. ashkenazi) last names. this guarantees an extreme disproportion not only of white ashkenazi respondents, but of wealthy and observant ones.
further, the survey was available only in english and russian, in a city with ‘known’ populations of jews whose primary language is spanish, arabic, yiddish, bokhari, azeri, tajik, malayalam, farsi (to name the larger communities). which is a deliberate decision to make it much more difficult for immigrant jews to participate. even so, the survey found 27% born outside the u.s., giving a hint at the scale of the actual number. now, plenty of immigrant jews are white ashkenazim. but even in NYC – where that’s more true than in, say, L.A. – the stereotype of the jewish immigrant as russian/ukrainian conceals (among many others) 30,000 people in the bukharian community alone. the treatment of this particular group of jews of color is worth noting: they’ve been welcomed with open arms more or less only by the lubavitshers, who are actively trying to replace their centuries-old bokhari traditions of worship with their hasidism-a-la-falwell ashkenazi missionary model. which is less Jim Crow than Manifest Destiny, but also pretty damn repulsive.
in any case, even at its root, the UJA-Fed survey’s approach is not a methodology based on asking how to find out who the jews are and where they live. it’s based on nothing but stereotyped answers to those questions, and aims rather directly at reproducing those stereotypes. and, as you’ve been so elegantly illustrating, when these surveys reproduce the stereotypes, they become a rationale for denying that the stereotypes are problematic.
it works like this: the UJA and JCRC aren’t welcoming to jews of color, so they have very very few jews of color in their mailing lists. their mailing lists are the basis of the survey approach, and thus the survey results reflect the demographics of their mailing lists, finding very very few jews of color. so the UJA and JCRC answer all such questions with “but our survey shows these communities are tiny and insignificant”.
but it gets better. they can’t actually make that answer, because the survey asked no questions about jewish ethnicity (ashkenazi/sefardi/beta yisrael/bnei yisrael/bukharian/&c) or race. in other words, there was an active decision made to make it impossible to identify jews of color if they were found.
that’s systematic erasure piled on systematic exclusion. sounds like Jim Crow to me.
daniel
February 11th, 2009 at 1:54 pm
also: adam – don’t be apologetic. get angry. fight racism in jewish communities. the kind of denial and rationalization you’ve been indulging in are often seen as typical signs of feeling of shame and guilt. channel that discomfort into productive work challenging and changing our communities until they in fact reflect the aspirations for them that you’ve presented in this discussion.
Adam Levick
February 12th, 2009 at 11:49 am
I don’t know what study you’re referring to. If you’re referring to the 2001 national Jewish population survey, that was handled, as are most such studies, by an outside market research firm – in this case, a company called Roper ASW. Here’s their summary of their methodological structure.
http://www.ujc.org/page.aspx?id=46185
I don’t see how you can look at this and state with any degree of confidence that there was a systemic attempt to under count Jews of color. I mean, look, reasonable people can take issue with the methodology w/o assuming malicious intent. How did this go down? Did the UJC instruct Roper ASW to do what they need to do in order to under count Jews of color in the survey? Is that what you are saying?
Finally, when you use loaded terms like “manifest destiny” to demonize observant Jews, there really is no discussion that can take place between us. Jim Crow, apartheid, and manifest destiny have absolutely no place within a reasonable debate about the Jewish community. Again, you’re sounding awfully similar to the language used by anti-Semites (not saying you are one, obviously, by why would you advance the same tropes about a clannish, racist, exclusionary people? Have the anti-Semites been right about us white Jews all along?).
There’s something about blogs which causes people to use the most incendiary language….not helpful in promoting rational debate about often important topics.
Walter Isaac
February 12th, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Equally my pleasure, Adam. Thanks for the exchange.
Daniel, your comments are quite revealing. Recently, a population study on Jews here in Cincinnati publicly released its findings, and it, too, had little or no reference to race or ethnicity.
http://www.jewishcincinnati.org/local_includes/downloads/28789.pdf
These are interesting and important questions, and so as our years progress, let us keep raising them. Perhaps, someday our children will learn many lessons from both our successes and our shortcomings. Peace be to you all.
AIDA
February 15th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
what is all this about intergration only americans are completley hung up about this. here in the uk jewish people go about their business continuing a way of life they have led for many years who gives a hoot if any religious group decides to go it alone as many over here do. of course i do not agree with how in israel they treat non askenazi and its quite scary when you understand the suffering over the years people of the this race have endured. however, when you look at the people in power in Israel they look very aryan i have yet to see a really dark jewish person wield any power. This part i find quite interesting.
Adam Levick
April 5th, 2009 at 10:07 pm
Story on the front page of the (Philly based) Jewish Exponent about a predominantly African-American congregation.
http://www.jewishexponent.com/article/18598/
Almaz
August 7th, 2009 at 10:26 am
As a person of colour that was born Jewish lived a good part of her life in Israel Yes I can attest that Racism is alive and well in the WHITE Jewish community here and in Israel and I get so tired that when this is brought up that some White Jews tend to want to put the Blame of the person on the recieving end of it buy going on Ad-naseum about oh you painting everyone with a broad brush Oh this study says this and that. Please stop and just accept that this is a fact
D.
August 15th, 2009 at 7:40 pm
I’m an African-American male that is converting to Judaism through the Conservative (Masorti) movement. In fact, my entire family, wife and children, will be converting as well. We have experienced a few Jews that were indifferent, to say the least, to our desire to become Jews. The overwhelming majority of Jews that we’ve met, however, have been incredibly supportive. They have welcomed us, opened up there homes to us and have made it their duty to insure that we are properly inducted into the culture. It sadens me deeply to read these stories, especially the story of the black man that was escorted out of the synagogue by the police. I remember first entering a synagogue and literally being greeted by a gang of welcomers wanting to know my Hebrew name (I note this for they’re first assumption was that I was a Jewish visitor), if I needed any assistance in understanding the customs and order of the service, etc. When I explained to them that I was considering conversion, they immediately introduced me to the rabbi after the service and the rest is history (at least for me anyway). During some rather frank conversations with my Jewish friends of European decent, Ashkenazi Jews tend to wrongfully associate all African-American Jews with the African Hebrew Israelites and their more radical, exclusionary rhetoric. One told me of his experience in New York City in which he was mocked and ridiculed in public by an African Hebrew Israelite that was preaching in Times Square. Another issue they have is with the sometimes stark difference in customs. Proper conversion (with immersion, circumcision, beit din, etc.) is of paramount importance to the mainstream Jewish movements. I cannot speak for the African Hebrew Israelite community. I believe that they have every right to consider themselves Jews as they embrace Torah just as all other Jews do. Yes, their rhetoric may be inflammatory, perhaps even incendiary, but they quite possibly could be some of the most observant Jews, outside of ortthodoxy, that one could meet. I do believe that the African-American voice within the Jewish community should be heard as it would undoubtedly add value to the American Jewish experience. We, the African-American Jews, must be the ones to do it. We can’t simply wait for other Jewish groups to recognize our diversity and our importance,we must assert it for ourselves. For instance, other than a few novelty sites that just simply list Black Jews, I cannot find ONE viable internet site dedicated to the African-American Jewish experience, especially those African-American Jews belonging to the mainstream movements. I’ll give credit to the African Hebrew Israelites in this regard as there are a number of sites dedicated to their cause. As with every movement for recognition, we must first recognize and celebrate the beauty in ourselves. We must organize and promote, highlight similarities rather than differences and take our rightful place in the Jewish community. It’s definitely not easy being a minority within a minority, but I do have faith in all of the Jewish people and I hold to the words of Torah for comfort and understanding. May Hashem bless us all.
Tali
August 29th, 2009 at 2:31 pm
I realize that this may be a little late, but I wanted to say a few things. As a preface, though, I have to admit that I didn’t read everything–but I got the jist of it.
The racial dynamics of Euro-American Jewry are complex and historically placed. There’s no doubt that all Jews have been scapegoats throughout history and even to the present. When things go badly, synagogues are bombed (like the one in Toulouse, France a couple months ago, or the Reform Temple here in Atlanta in the sixties), Jews are targeted as “Christ-Killers,” etc. So Euro-American Jews ‘whiteness is complex and contradictory–something I think Melanie Kay/Kantrowitz points out quite well. Rozelle and Walter, I very much appreciate your eloquent comments. Adam, you say that you want evidence beyond anecdotes, but you rely on the same measure of veracity when you’ve not personally seen racism in white-dominated Jewish communities.
One more general point: I think we should get away from the idea of a monolithic idea of “The Jewish Community.” That title carries with it a multitude of implicit meanings–and, perhaps more noticeably–absence. At the very least, it connotes the normative ‘Yiddish speaking, heterosexual, nondisabled Jew’ at the exclusion of all other facets of what any Jew living on the margins of a culture composed of structures of race, class, nationality, gender, sex, and dis/ability. I’m a queer, disabled/chronically ill cis-gender Jewish man form the south. I live on the margins of a lot of different minoritzed peoples, and I very rarely feel safe or ‘at home’ in any of them. We need to recognize, I think, the importance of multiplicity without losing our sense of shared, if different, histories and ways of living in this world.
Symphony of Brotherhood ~Miri Ben-Ari |
January 17th, 2010 at 4:02 pm
[...] On Dr. King’s Legacy and American Jewish Segregation: A Moment of Honesty by Walter Isaac [...]
Rishona
February 17th, 2011 at 6:26 pm
Wonderful, wonderful article!
In Israel, the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Forest |
January 15th, 2012 at 12:08 am
[...] On Dr. King’s Legacy and American Jewish Segregation: A Moment of Honesty by Walter Isaac. Read it HERE [...]
Black HYPHEN!! Jewish | MaNishtana's Musings
April 8th, 2013 at 8:28 pm
[...] Yep. I can see it. How dare he operate from this foreign-to-Judaism concept of “Blackness” by wearing a kippah and tallit to pray?! The nerve. Read more comments here. [...]