It is with absolute outrage and a deep sadness that we write this statement regarding our experience working with the Koffler Centre of the Arts. As a Jewish curator and Jewish artist, we were invited by the Koffler to develop a project in early 2008. Since April of last year we have been working closely on an off-site exhibition wholeheartedly approved by Koffler curator Mona Filip, Koffler Executive Director Lori Starr and the Koffler Arts Advisory Committee.
Slated to open on May 20th 2009, the project, entitled each hand as they are called, is an ambitious and considered series of ephemeral gestures reflective of life in Toronto’s historic Kensington Market. The project consists of sonic and visual performances, brings elders from Toronto’s Jewish community into conversation and play with students from Ryerson Public School, and involves a series of vivid posters designed by Cecilica Berkovic sited throughout the Kensington neighborhood. This beautiful, smart and tender project reflects a deep commitment to animating a dialogue between aspects of Toronto’s diverse Jewish/Yiddish history and its fascinating contact with other cultures. Through a queer framing of social history, this dialogue draws on the current social and economic space of Kensington Market, the trans-cultural game of Mah-Jongg, and the fusion music of the North American Yiddish song.
THE FACTS:
Late on Thursday, May 7th we received an email requesting our attendance at an urgent meeting with Lori Starr and Mona Filip, scheduled for Friday, May 8th at 9:00 AM. When we inquired about the agenda of the meeting, Filip refused to answer. The next morning, twelve days before the scheduled opening of a project involving over seventy participants, we attended the meeting. We were shocked to learn that the Koffler would be dissociating itself from Katz and our project solely on the basis of her political affiliations they said they had discovered on the Internet. Of particular concern was Katz’s participation in Israeli Apartheid Week. Starr made a verbal offer to honor the full funding of the project while removing the Koffler’s name, logo and URL from any related material. Before leaving the meeting we requested a discussion with the Koffler Board of Directors and Starr agreed to take the request under advisement. The one-hour meeting ended with many questions unanswered, and it was agreed that we would be in contact again with the Koffler on Monday, May 12th about whether and how to continue such a difficult working relationship. In less than one hour after this meeting, the Koffler and its parent organization United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto (UJA) issued separate public statements of dissociation from Katz.
FROM KIM SIMON, CURATOR:
Now distributed to an international network, the Koffler and UJA’s statements are a hypocritical, inaccurate account of Katz’s work for human rights in Palestine. They constitute an irresponsible, inflammatory and slanderous attempt to discredit Katz and by extension her work as an artist. After a year of dialogue with us, to be summarily dismissed by Starr and Filip without opportunity for discussion is shocking to say the least.
The Koffler had full knowledge of the work Katz has done over the course of a year to develop close relationships enabling dialogue and collaboration with numerous organizations and individuals participating in her exhibition. While verbally agreeing to continue funding for the exhibition, the Koffler’s reprehensible and uniquely unprofessional conduct has in effect placed the project in jeopardy. At this time, several key collaborators in the project have withdrawn their participation due to the discomfort directly caused by the Koffler and UJA statements.
In their public dissociation from Katz’s exhibition, not on the basis of the aesthetics and content of the work but rather on the presumed opinions of the artist, the Koffler has entered into a practice of cultural blacklisting reminiscent of the 1950s and McCarthyism. I cannot overstate my disappointment in this institution that claims its mission as strengthening “identity and community while fostering an appreciation of difference.” The Koffler’s dissociation with Katz is a complete undermining of open dialogue within the Jewish community of Toronto and a great disservice to the Toronto cultural community, and the greater community of this city. As a condition for receiving financial support, the City of Toronto requires all organizations to follow policies that clearly prohibit discrimination and harassment on the basis of political affiliation. The Koffler Centre for the Arts has unwisely chosen to follow a different course and thus effectively rendered itself an undemocratic cultural space.
Katz is a person for whom I have deep respect. It has been my honor and privilege to work with her, learn from her and debate with her. I am appalled and heartbroken over the manner in which she has been treated by the Koffler Centre for the Arts.
FROM REENA KATZ, ARTIST
I come from a family of many Holocaust Survivors. My elders’ stories of resistance and survival have deeply informed my visual and sound work. In a number of Jewish contexts, I was taught to embrace tolerance and fight racism in all its forms. It is this wisdom and ethical rooting that informs my art practice as well as my activism. My relational, sound and sculptural work have a consistent reference to oral archive, Yiddish texts, Jewish metaphor, and culturally specific imagery.
Starting at age 16, I studied Yiddish with my great-aunts, both of whom lived at the Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, a participating organization in the project. I have been a student, teacher, and performer of Yiddish and Klezmer for the past 14 years. I have worked within Jewish, multi-faith, and secular forums to educate around anti-Semitism, racism, homophobia, and sexism.
I bring an irreverent, creative, and queer voice to my Jewish cultural work, critiquing and transforming traditions into contemporary praxis. My projects build bridges between the diverse communities I am a part of, forming my esteemed reputation as a community-based artist. It repulses me that I have to justify my practice here, as I sit falsely accused. I am as Jewish as they come, and not the Jew the Koffler claims me to be.
Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) and its organizers do not act to delegitimize Israel, but rather, “to educate people about the nature of Israel as an apartheid system and to build Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns as part of a growing global BDS movement.” I have not stated that I advocate for the “extinction of Israel as a Jewish State” as the Koffler’s statement claims. What I do state publicly is that I am an anti-Zionist Jew. This is an ideological stance, not one that determines any specific outcome for the contemporary state of Israel. I consider the Koffler’s press release a blatant misrepresentation of my position as well as that of IAW.
I do not expect the Koffler or the UJA to agree with my political leanings. The issue here is the silence because of my political affiliations, and the stonewalling of internal dissent and debate within our cultural institutions. I am deeply committed to open discussion both within Jewish communities and with Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim communities worldwide. Dissent and discourse are crucial parts of this now global conversation; silencing and blocklisting are cowardly and toxic. At no point along the way was I asked to represent myself, my ideas, or the mandates of the groups I belong to, despite amicable, almost daily contacts with Filip for many months.
One of the first steps towards dialogue and understanding is upholding the rights of expression and free association. The arts especially, are fertile ground on which communities can come together with respect and creative vision. Cultural workers and artists must be allowed to speak honestly, stir passions, disturb – as well as kindle – justice and peace.
MOVING FORWARD
Since the release of the Koffler and UJA statements we have received overwhelming support from an international community of artists, curators, public arts organizations, educators and organizers. We greatly appreciate your attention to this matter. In further consideration we suggest you continue to question what is at stake in the Koffler’s decision. We respectfully request your support in the form of continued dialogue with each other and a critical inquiry regarding all forms of support to the Koffler Center of the Arts.
Rest assured that the presentation of each hand as they are called will go on, even if this means an amendment to the original project. We look forward to inviting you to the opening.
Please visit our blog at eachhand.org and the eachhand Facebook page which will be up and running by May 12, 2009. For any questions or comments, please contact Reena Katz at radiodress@rogers.com and Kim Simon at kimshoshanasimon@gmail.com
Hot Tip? Deliver Yours
Haiti by Ricardo Levins Morales
This poster is sold signed. Half of the proceeds goes to Parners in Health for earth quake relief. PIH is the grassroots organization established in Haiti by Dr. Paul Farmer. It is Haitian-led and provides direct assistance in Haitian communities without the costs of an administrative bureaucracy. Thanks, Ricardo www.rlmarts.com
blog advertising is good for you
MuzzleWatch » More McCarthyism in Toronto: Outrageous censorship over artist’s views
May 12th, 2009 at 12:45 am
[...] so great, they offered to let her keep the money, while pulling their name off of everything. JVoices has Reena’s entire statement, as well as the statement of project curator Kim Simon, also Jewish, also pissed off: It is with [...]
Nick Van der Graaf
May 12th, 2009 at 6:35 am
Good for you! The fight for freedom of expression is incredibly important for all of us.
Keep on fighting – but remember you are fighting against the other’s fear, not anger, and gauge your tactics appropriately.
Topics about Arab » Two Jewish cultural workers, 30,000 opinions: A public statement…
May 12th, 2009 at 9:53 am
[...] Thomas Land placed an interesting blog post on Two Jewish cultural workers, 30,000 opinions: A public statement…Here’s a brief overviewI am deeply committed to open discussion both within Jewish communities and with Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim communities worldwide. [...]
R. Smith
May 12th, 2009 at 10:06 pm
Israeli Apartheid Week is a forum in support of racism and lies. Reena Katz’s participation is more than sufficient justification for the Jewish community to disassociate themselves from her.
jason adrock
May 13th, 2009 at 7:44 am
In the arena of Israeli/Palestinian dialogue, already fraught with so much tension where every sentence is parsed and the meaning of each word analyzed, the notion of “Israel Apartheid Week” crosses into darker territory. Filled with historical inaccuracies it serves only to detract from meaningful dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians. It is not surprising then that Koffler decided to end their association with Katz. They are not suggesting that the artist censor herself. Nor are they recommending to other organizations that they boycott her work. Rather, it seems that “Israel Apartheid Week” and Katz’s support of it was distasteful to them as it was to many Jews and non Jews alike. Their withdrawal of support seems perfectly reasonable. For her to complain makes her seem spoiled and entitled.
ann
May 13th, 2009 at 1:57 pm
Isn’t Israel’s illegal military occupation of Palestine ‘distasteful’? Isn’t allowng Jewish settlers to attack Palestinian schoolchldren with impunity ‘racism’? Isn’t ‘associating’ only with artists who support these policies fairly ‘dark territory’?
jason adrock
May 13th, 2009 at 8:37 pm
Ann, Israel’s occupation of the territories may indeed be distasteful as are attacks on Palestinians by settlers. But critics such as you fail to include in their basket of “distasteful” acts, Hamas’ use of human shields from which rockets are launched on civilians, suicide bombings, Hamas’ charter that calls for the elimination of Israel and Hamas’ systematic beatings and executions to any opposed to their politics. That one sided vilification of Israel is the “dark territory” I refer to. Reena Katz’s issues are rather pedestrian by comparison don’t you think? Would she, after all, continue to lend her name in support of a group that she suddenly discovered vilified gays and lesbians? I think not.
Tamir Bar-On
May 14th, 2009 at 11:55 am
I am a professor of political science based in Toronto. Please see my response to the Katz controversy, “McCarthyism Cuts Both Ways,” on my blog Big and Strong as a Palm Tree:
http://tamirbaron.blogspot.com/
Tamir Bar-On
‘Anti-Semitism or artistic chill?’ on CBC Radio - JVOICES.COM
May 15th, 2009 at 12:55 pm
[...] Brith Canada petitioned to the City’s Mayor to shut down, and on the Koffler’s recent decision to disassociate itself with artist Reena Katz. Here’s the segment: [...]
Mike Hoolboom
May 19th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
It is not the place of art galleries or art curators to decide whether artists are moral enough, or good enough people, to show in their spaces. The Koffler Center is not only engaging in an act of censorship, it is deliberately distorting the views of the artist.
Leslie O'Shea
May 27th, 2009 at 4:39 pm
Good for the Koffler Center. I can enjoy the works of someone whose politics are diametrically opposed to mine but I certainly don’t have to support them with my name or my money. Koffler was right in removing their name from her show. They didn’t call for a boycott nor withdraw their funding so what’s all the fuss about? Grow up folks.
John
January 19th, 2010 at 12:55 pm
Take a look at Reena Katz on Masada2000
http://masada2000.org/list-K.html#Reena-Katz
Enjoy
Mazal Tov: Tobaron Waxman is the winner of The Jewish Museum’s first-ever Audience Award | Jewschool
February 3rd, 2010 at 12:06 am
[...] have seen my work and other people’s work censored in the past, many times. (For example, the situation last year at the Koffler, a United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto (UJA) sponsored in cultural center [...]