First published in the Jewish Independent.
East European tradition is religious hallmark.
LOOLWA KHAZZOOM
I entered the study hall of the Iraqi synagogue in Ramat Gan – the synagogue where I’d spent my childhood summers. Some of the women sat on the outskirts of the hall, literally outside, and others sat pressed against the right side wall, huddled together meekly. The men filled up the rest of the room, with their grand physical gestures, booming voices and uninhibited laughter. Disgruntled and disappointed, yet not surprised, I joined the makeshift women’s section.
The rabbi was dressed in standard Ashkenazi garb – black suit, white shirt, black hat – no surprise, considering that the seating arrangements and overall energy smacked of eastern European rigidity. Though he spoke of Yom Kippur customs through the teachings of Hacham Yosef Hayim, the leading religious figure of Iraq, the rabbi did so in a way far removed from traditional Iraqi practice. Each time I asked a question, he put up his hand to the side of his face, as if to block my existence from his reality, while the men clamored in an uproar that a woman had the audacity to speak.
At first, I was not actually sure if the hand went up to hush the men’s clamor or to silence me. The first two times, after all, the rabbi did answer my questions, once people quieted down. He spoke facing straight ahead, however, refusing to look even vaguely in my direction – as if doing so would sully his holiness. The third time, however, when not only the men but also the women completely freaked out about the fact that I was speaking, the hand went up again and the rabbi refused to answer my question. After causing one more commotion by turning to the women to see if they knew the answer (they did), I picked up my belongings and left.
I considered creating a public ruckus – challenging the rabbi and congregants on this clear turn against our heritage – instead of leaving quietly. I also considered approaching the rabbi at another time, to advise him that his behavior had chased out of the synagogue a Jew thirsty for knowledge. But I’d been hurt so much as a girl and young woman in what is supposed to be my community that I just could not handle another confrontation.
I grew up observant and was a flaming Jew pretty much from birth – willing to risk my life for my people and our beliefs. That’s why, weeks after a friend was nearly shot boarding a plane to Israel from Los Angeles, days after a suicide bomber blew up scores of students at the Hebrew University cafeteria in Jerusalem, amidst a wave of terrorist attacks across the Jewish state and with Israel and Iraq on the brink of war, I left my quiet, tree-lined street in Berkeley, Calif., and made aliyah to Israel – settling in Be’ersheva, a small desert city in the south.
Israelis repeatedly expressed their shock and confusion that an American-born and -raised Jew would choose what is considered a boonie town like Be’ersheva – seen by most as the transfer point for a bus to Eilat – instead of the hustle and bustle of Tel-Aviv or Jerusalem. A major part of my draw to Israel, however, was having the chance to connect deeply with Jews of Middle Eastern and African heritage. With Moroccan and Iraqi neighbors directly across from me, Indian, Turkish and Iranian neighbors on the floors below, Ethiopian neighbors across the street and a Tunisian synagogue just at the edge of my balcony (eliminating the need to get out of my pajamas to participate in morning prayers), I was exactly where I wanted to be.
I had stopped attending religious services while living in Berkeley and I had all but completely withdrawn from Jewish community life in the area. The organized Mizrahi/Sephardi community was tiny, a two-hour round trip away, and, for reasons I won’t get into here, not the community I wanted to be part of. In addition, there was only one Ethiopian Jew I knew of in the area. With few exceptions, the only multicultural Jewish experience I had was when I was teaching or otherwise leading a program. I was hungry for the plethora of Mizrahi, Sephardi and Ethiopian community options to choose from in Be’ersheva.
As it turned out, there were many different synagogues to attend, with the chazzanim at each following the liturgy of their respective countries of origin, but every community was otherwise homogenous in its practice. The ultra-Orthodox tenets of central and eastern European shtetls, I discovered, have come to dominate that which is defined as “religious” in Israel.
Traditionally, Middle Eastern and African Jewish communities emphasized the concept of chesed, or compassion, over that of mahmir, or strictness. Judaism was a vehicle for joy and celebration, not an instrument of fear and condemnation. One wall around the Torah was enough. We did not need a wall around a wall around a wall. Today, however, that foundational approach has been buried deep in our past, and religious life is now a contest between who can be the strictest, most intolerant of all – especially when it comes to women.
In traditional Mizrahi and Sephardi synagogues, for example, the women generally sat upstairs in the gallery, where they had full view of the service led below, and where they were welcome to sing at full volume along with the male congregants. I vividly remember the passion of women with white lace head coverings and colorful dresses, praying from the bottoms of their hearts and the depths of their souls, closing their eyes while holding their hands open and in front of them, as if to gather the energy being raised by the congregants, then bringing their hands to their faces and kissing them – as if they were kissing G-d.
Today, in most of the Mizrahi and Sephardi synagogues I have attended in Israel, that image has been replaced by one of resigned women silently crumpled in their chairs – some bored and staring into space, others talking, still others holding out their hands – this time behind an energetic layer of fear and a physical barrier to the space below. Not only are women seated in the gallery today (quite enough to keep us separate from the men, thank you very much), but there is a wall blocking our visual connection to the service – purportedly to keep us way, way out of men’s line of sight. Just in case that wall is not enough, there is also a curtain hanging on top of it, one which must not be moved for all but one part of the service. To top it all off, women’s voices must not, under any circumstances, be audible to the men below.
And so, as I ran open-hearted to the Tunisian, Algerian and Moroccan synagogues peppering my neighborhood in Be’ersheva, eager to fully reclaim my observant Jewish practice and to re-embrace communal Jewish life, I found myself crashing into physical, energetic, spiritual and emotional blockades. Unwilling to accept these barriers – affronts not only to my feminist sensibility but also to thousands of years of Mizrahi and Sephardi Jewish practice – I launched a one-woman rebellion throughout the city and across the country, singing out loud and pushing the curtains to the side wherever I prayed. Synagogue attendance thus came to mean constant battles between myself and, ironically, the women “gatekeepers” of the congregation – whose sole purpose in life seemed to be keeping all the ladies in check.
The experience became so unpleasant that, over time, I stopped going to synagogue and, as the months and years rolled by, even stopped observing traditions at home. A holier-than-thou, suffering-oriented approach to Judaism – ironically steeped in the non-Jewish mindset of Christian Europe – clearly had hijacked religious Jewish practice in Israel, leaving me feeling frustrated, resentful and alone.
While there are a few pockets of practising Jews who refuse to kowtow to this narrow definition of “religious Judaism,” most observant and secular Jews alike, from every ethnic branch, have fallen in step – to the point that people refuse to believe that I am “religious” if I am wearing a pair of jeans. What’s more, the Israeli government enforces this ideology: While at the Kotel, praying wholeheartedly to G-d, I have repeatedly found myself surrounded by soldiers and police officers ordering me to be quiet. Make no mistake: the Western Wall has yet to be liberated.
I wonder why those who promote rigidity, suffering and alienation are willing to stake their claim to our 4,000-year-old heritage, but those who promote flexibility, joy and inclusion are not. The Torah specifically states that it is as wrong to overdo observance as it is to underdo it: “You shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall you diminish from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your G-d which I command you.” (Deuteronomy 4:2)
Until we recognize that a black-hatted, three-times-a-day davening, super-extra-deluxe-kosher Jew can be just as much of an apikoros (heretic) as a string-bikini-wearing, Nietzsche-loving, pork-scarfing member of the tribe; until our understanding of “religious” reflects this recognition; and until Mizrahi, Sephardi and Ethiopian Jews refuse to let European shtetl ideology set the tone for our Jewish practice, I will continue to feel that someone has walked off with my religion.
Loolwa Khazzoom has published internationally in such outlets as the Washington Post, BBC News, Cosmopolitan and Marie Claire. She is also the editor of The Flying Camel: Essays on Identity by Women of North African and Middle Eastern Jewish Heritage.
This poster is sold signed. Half of the proceeds goes to Parners in Health for earth quake relief. PIH is the grassroots organization established in Haiti by Dr. Paul Farmer. It is Haitian-led and provides direct assistance in Haitian communities without the costs of an administrative bureaucracy. Thanks, Ricardo www.rlmarts.com
blog advertising is good for you
ephraim
August 29th, 2006 at 4:45 pm
I found the link to this from jewschool about a week too late (i was off in ashkenazo-land for a week without internet acess).
I’ve been thinking about this alot lately, so i’ll throw in that i think a distinction needs to be made between actual Ashkenazic culture on the one hand, and either mainstream, mainline Jewish “culture” run by people of Ashkenazic background or fundamentalist, chareidi culture on the other.
To put it briefly, the fundamentalists and the secular assimilationists co-oped what “religious” means from us too, not to mention co-opting what “Ashkenazic” means. This isn’t to deny any kind of number or power differential either in Israel or in North America or that the media representation of steryotypical “jew” things is equivalent to a dumb, distilled version of Ashkenazic tropes, but to conflate the whole of Ashkenaz with either the super-frum or with the folks who run AIPAC or the ADL, does everyone a disservice. Just because they claim to be the authentic direct heirs to the “european shtetl ideology” doesn’t make that true – and in fact in some ways they’ve changed as much as the secular, assimilationist Ashkenazim have. Life on the ground in the shtetl was never as black-and-white (neither were the clothes) as the khsidm/litvish/nostalgia/etc romanticize it to be.
If they stole your “Judaism”, then they stole my “Yiddishkeit”.
The idea of a multi-vocal, multi-cultural, Jewishness is highly appealing to me for many reasons, but i believe that the diversity of marginalized Ashkenazic voices needs to be included in that, and not conflated with the the mainline powers that be as one hegemonic European lump.
Becca
September 1st, 2006 at 1:11 am
Hear, hear–to both Loolwa & Ephraim.
It may be little consolation, but the open-minded, warm, and embracing Mizrahi/Sefardi community you write of & were hoping to find in Be’er Sheva seems to be alive & well here in the DC area. Visiting Magen David Sephardic Congregation (http://www.magendavidsynagogue.com/) in Rockville last Shabbat for Friday night services and talking with the wonderful young rabbi of the congregation, we learned about the wide variation in observance & approach in his congregation (down to the devoted young guy who keeps coming to Shabbat mincha…with a Starbucks coffee in his hand. Yes, it’s a Shabbat no-no to buy coffee on Shabbat–but it’s good that he’s there, so no one’s going to shame him & tell him he’s being a bad Jew).
I’m a gender-egalitarian Jew through & through (generally finding my home in the Conservative/Masorti movement, with some Reconstructionist leanings)–but the women’s section(s) at Magen David count as among the least distressing/off-putting that I’ve encountered:
2 wings on very slightly elevated ramps toward the rear of the prayer space, with a low and not sight-obstructing dividing element (wall) marking the division between this area and the adjacent men’s seating area, not far distant from the central teva/davening & reading platform.
And no one looked at me cross-eyed for singing heartily along.
(Rabbi Maroof has a blog with podcasts on various topics at http://www.magendavidsephardic.blogspot.com/ and a more usual text blog at http://askrabbimaroof.blogspot.com/)
So if you’re ever in Rockville–go to Magen David, and talk to Rabbi Maroof!
rozele
September 5th, 2006 at 1:16 am
i want to second ephraim’s point, perhaps in a slightly different direction…
these attacks on and attempts to destroy mizrakhi/sefardi/ethiopian/etc traditions of observance are, it seems to me, a continuation of the attacks directed at ashkenazi culture in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. the derogatory term then was ‘ostjuden’, which, interestingly, means ‘east-jews’, just as the catch-all ‘mizrakhi’ does.
(religion and gender were also two of the key areas of that fight – many traditional ashkenazi practices, especially those associated with women, were dismissed as ‘superstition’; a great deal of effort was spent bringing ashkenazi gender roles in line with the bourgeois christian mode.)
those earlier attacks were led, as the current ones are, by assimilated ashkenazim with a very specific agenda of ‘normalizing’ jewish culture into a single mold, one more palatable to european christian tastes. this ideology has been the driving force in both periods, insisting that the whole kaleidescope of jewish cultures must be made over into one monochrome image, that gender roles must be strictly enforced to mimic european christian ones.
the whole complex is summed up in the notion of ‘shelilat hagalut’, ‘the negation of the diaspora’: the idea that all traditional jewish cultures must be rejected as tainted and destroyed, to be replaced by a unitary national culture centered in a nation-state.
the assimilated ashkenazi authors of this ideology – theodor herzl, max nordau, etc. – began by attacking the culture of their own families. they denied ‘yiddish’s status as a language, called ‘ostjuden’ “degenerates” and worse, and propagandized against all aspects of ashkenazi culture. the same arsenal of cultural warfare was turned on jews from the rest of the world once it was clear that their dreamed-of nation-state would not be built by the children of ‘ostjuden’ alone.
and now we have the disgusting spectacle of the culture created by these negaters-of-the-diaspora being forced on other jews and called by the name of ashkenaz.
who stole the many jewishnesses and judaisms that grew in the varied landscapes of communities from rabat to cochin, vilne to wolleka, bukhara to toledo?
those who say borsht is ‘jewish’ food but not XXXXX. those who teach sefardi kids not to pronounce their ayins and ashkenazi kids to say ‘shabbat’ instead of ‘shabes’. those who tell us to look for our families’ home in ‘judea and samaria’ not in daghestan, czernowitz, salonika, kolkata, isfahan – or in some cases al-khalil or sfat.
but above all, those who try to get us to give away our own histories and cultures in exchange for the borrowed myth of the nation-state.
rozele
September 5th, 2006 at 1:29 am
apologies – that 2nd-to-last paragraph was a draft that should read:
those who say borsht is jewish food but not haleq, the fidl is a jewish instrument and not the rebab, yiddish is a jewish language and not arabic. those who teach sefardi kids not to pronounce their ayins and ashkenazi kids to say ‘shabbat’ instead of ‘shabes’. those who tell us to look for our families’ home in ‘judea and samaria’ not in daghestan, czernowitz, salonika, kolkata, isfahan – or in some cases al-khalil or sfat.
Jewschool » Blog Archive » Creation of Tapestry
October 3rd, 2006 at 9:29 am
[...] Khazzoom writes for a number of publications, and recently wrote an article entitled, “Who Stole My Judaism?” for the Jewish Independent. You can find this article on JVoices–here’s a taste: Traditionally, Middle Eastern and African Jewish communities emphasized the concept of chesed, or compassion, over that of mahmir, or strictness. Judaism was a vehicle for joy and celebration, not an instrument of fear and condemnation. One wall around the Torah was enough. We did not need a wall around a wall around a wall. [...]
Disappearing the Sephardim « Modern Mitzvot
June 17th, 2008 at 10:14 am
[...] addition, this fine post from JVoices gives a rather personal description of the differences in traditional Sephardic services and how [...]